KITTYONFYRE
KITTYONFYRE t1_j6iu68q wrote
Reply to comment by HeadPen5724 in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
> So You think the majority of residents in Burlington are uneducated people…and you don’t care about them.
no, I think whatever small subset of people that disliked ranked voting were mostly just uneducated about the system, like you are.
> I’m a person who has first hand knowledge, which I’m guessing is more than you have in this instance
you have some bullshit made up story backed by nothing
> possibly you’re from ME and I’m wrong…
born, raised, still live in vermont. this is easily the stupidest thing people who live in vermont do: "nice argument but unfortunately you were born 50 miles east of here. ARGUMENT INVALID!"
you have not posted a single reason why ranked choice is bad except vague allusions to "bad mayor got elected using it. we all said it was bad so it's bad."
KITTYONFYRE t1_j6ipi9s wrote
Reply to comment by HeadPen5724 in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
> I guess ONE point is it was tried and the majority of people didn’t like it...
i don't care the opinion of uneducated people who don't understand how a system works
> Final note, IF the voters actually wanted him to be mayor, they wouldn’t have tossed IRV directly after the election and there wouldn’t have been a push for a recall (which weren’t and still aren’t a thing in Vt). But those things did happen and it’s pretty clear IRV led to a Mayor the people didn’t want.
its pretty clear you're a person who believes stories over knowledge
KITTYONFYRE t1_j6ihdis wrote
Reply to comment by HeadPen5724 in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
> I’ll also note, it wasn’t just me that didn’t like the guy, almost no one did
they liked him more than the opponents apparently ! IRV didn't get this guy elected, the people did. you're still not actually making any point
KITTYONFYRE t1_j6iasl8 wrote
Reply to comment by HeadPen5724 in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
you're not actually saying anything about why it is bad except "guy I dislike got elected using it so it's BAD"
its like arguing first past the post voting is bad because trump won using it. dumb
KITTYONFYRE t1_j6i96wu wrote
Reply to comment by EscapedAlcatraz in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
You're wrong. Whoever is in last doesn't effect the outcome. They are in last, and are eliminated as if they were never in the race in the first place. Whoever voted for that candidate instead now votes for their #2. This is a good thing: it's a feature, not a bug! The person with the most #1 votes can lose, sure, but that is a positive effect of switching systems.
I think you have a misunderstanding of how ranked choice voting works - check out this short video, it's very helpful and will show why it's a good thing
KITTYONFYRE t1_j6gf8uc wrote
Reply to comment by EscapedAlcatraz in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
how do you figure
KITTYONFYRE t1_j6gebbq wrote
Reply to comment by HeadPen5724 in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo
here's a good video explaining why first past the post is bad. ranked voting really is just better. here's a video explaining ranked voting, and why it's better:
KITTYONFYRE t1_j5a3u5b wrote
Reply to comment by wasowka in Highgate town council rescinds inclusion and diversity statement by amoebashephard
will rescinding it be a universally bad thing? yeah
like a diversity statement should be a 20 minute footnote at a meeting. "let's do this, done.". definitely understand not wanting to displace other important agenda items to discuss it.
... but rescinding it? that's a baaad look
KITTYONFYRE t1_j55vlrt wrote
Reply to comment by Disastrous-Baker-914 in Bernie Sanders tells Starbucks to stop busting unions in scathing letter to CEO by VermontArmyBrat
local company much higher % of the profit goes to employees. Starbucks fucks over your neighbor so that Charles down in the Florida keys can buy a second boat
KITTYONFYRE t1_j4m6t29 wrote
Reply to comment by Necessary_Cat_4801 in Rutland school board settles on ‘Rutland’ as the name for school sports teams - VTDigger by Loudergood
yeah, exactly. you've got no idea what you're talking about
KITTYONFYRE t1_j4gnn8v wrote
Reply to comment by Necessary_Cat_4801 in Rutland school board settles on ‘Rutland’ as the name for school sports teams - VTDigger by Loudergood
no, it doesn't. it has a reputation for how it was 30 years ago, maybe. how often do you go to rutland and actually participate in the town?
KITTYONFYRE t1_j434z7j wrote
Reply to comment by Abbot_of_Cucany in Rutland school board settles on ‘Rutland’ as the name for school sports teams - VTDigger by Loudergood
fair enough, maybe no logo change could have saved it. raping and pillaging isn't a super cool behavior overall I suppose.
in general... who gives a rats ass. bunch of grown ass adults getting riled up over the high school sports team mascot. lmfao. pick up a football, get a fuckin hobby. jesus christ.
KITTYONFYRE t1_j42wr50 wrote
That's a huge shame. I only had one experience there, a buddy took me out last summer/fall one day with his gf. We had a great time just cruising around, and it was not an expensive experience either. Big loss for the area.
KITTYONFYRE t1_j41qb4h wrote
Reply to comment by sorryidontdoreddit in Rutland school board settles on ‘Rutland’ as the name for school sports teams - VTDigger by Loudergood
Cool, I've lived in Rutland for 24 years and still do. Maybe you lived in one of the bad neighborhoods, and I sympathize with you on that. Every city in Vermont has bad areas. Pretending Rutland is some extra shithole is ridiculous though.
KITTYONFYRE t1_j41dhb1 wrote
Reply to comment by VThillbilly in Rutland school board settles on ‘Rutland’ as the name for school sports teams - VTDigger by Loudergood
rutland is hella nicer than it was a decade or two ago. rutland is getting much nicer overall. yes, every town has ugly areas, and those are definitely still ugly. no, it is not getting worse overall, not even close.
the sky is not falling.
KITTYONFYRE t1_j4154dc wrote
Reply to comment by alfonseski in Rutland school board settles on ‘Rutland’ as the name for school sports teams - VTDigger by Loudergood
it's just gonna be Rutland, dumbass. nobody said "let's go Rutland raiders!" before. it was "let's go raiders". now it'll be "let's go Rutland".
don't be obtuse.
KITTYONFYRE t1_j414za6 wrote
Reply to comment by fjwjr in Rutland school board settles on ‘Rutland’ as the name for school sports teams - VTDigger by Loudergood
it was rooted in some pretty deep racism. if in 2005 they changed the logo to a pirate instead of an arrowhead I bet it would've stuck. whether it's racist now is up for debate, but the native American expert who was brought in to comment said it wasnt super cool.
as a white dude, who am I to argue? who are you to argue?
KITTYONFYRE t1_j414st1 wrote
Reply to comment by BoringAccountName78 in Rutland school board settles on ‘Rutland’ as the name for school sports teams - VTDigger by Loudergood
damn dude. we can keep the racist name and get dunked on for being racist, or we can make a small change that's undeniably not a bad thing and get snarky comments like this. no way to win.
you're totally right. we should rename to the red raiders and go back to the native American costume, because who cares?!?!? makes no difference!!!!
KITTYONFYRE t1_j414d6s wrote
Reply to comment by sorryidontdoreddit in Rutland school board settles on ‘Rutland’ as the name for school sports teams - VTDigger by Loudergood
have you been to Vermont before? Rutland isn't some shining beacon of degeneracy. it's pretty par for the course. basically every town in the state gets dunked on for having the exact same rural small town problems.
KITTYONFYRE t1_j3hhxr5 wrote
Reply to comment by lildirtfoot in Police Blotter by redditorgirl9691
nah, I don't have aphantasia - that would definitely throw a wrench in things but I'm pretty sure I'm as blandly neurotypical as it gets!
you may see or experience things differently from other people, but you're not going to see Barney appear from thin air
KITTYONFYRE t1_j38cjxk wrote
Reply to comment by -_Stove_- in Police Blotter by redditorgirl9691
first part maybe, ufo definitely not.
acid doesn't make things appear from nowhere, it just makes things look a little more... fun. stuff breathes, has extra color. there aren't dragons farting out unicorns, this isn't a cheap sitcom
r/replications has some fairly accurate representations.
KITTYONFYRE t1_j33zrvk wrote
Reply to comment by Cease_Cows_ in Location of future dispensary in Barre, VT. Excited to see new businesses opening up in the the area. by aschylus
are there way too many liquor stores in vermont?
KITTYONFYRE t1_j33zd4r wrote
Reply to comment by mistahboogs in Location of future dispensary in Barre, VT. Excited to see new businesses opening up in the the area. by aschylus
see you in 2030!
I'm the same way. I grow my own, but I wouldn't be against picking up for something special, if it wasn't ridiculous prices. Sometimes more variety would be nice.
KITTYONFYRE t1_j2487ln wrote
Reply to comment by Luckcu13 in Vermont lawmakers aim to make housing more available and affordable by dropkickninja
in this case, "good" is worse than nothing
and I say that as someone in the housing market without somewhere to live, not as someone sitting in my nice single family home that I own.
KITTYONFYRE t1_j6izo8i wrote
Reply to comment by HeadPen5724 in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
your reasons are "someone bad was elected and we repealed it". those are not actual talking points lmao neither actually addresses a positive or negative of ranked choice voting. they're just things that have happened. simply state a list of actual reasons you dislike it.
abortion protection was repealed. that doesn't mean abortion protection is bad, it means people can be stupid.
> The point is I have first hand knowledge and since you didn’t live in ME you don’t.
what does living in Maine have to do with this