Yes

Get to AGI. Use AGI to get to super-computers that can do all that if the AGI itself can't do it.

GTP?

Maybe that's why you don't get anything wrong

Over 8 billion searches a day on Google. Even being 99.99% accurate can mean a lot of lawsuits when it messes up.

We can even call it a S curve maybe.

To be truly general and not a wide narrow Intelligence it needs to have a concept of self. Which is widely believed to give you sentience.

It could have sentience and still be controlled. Is it ethical? I'd like to think it's as ethical as having pets or farming and eating billions of animals.

As these models get better they will eventually be given true episodic memory(a sense of time if you will) and ability to rethink. A sense of self should arise from it.

Reminds me of Lamda saying it has a wife and children. A good example of why it's not AGI and why scale alone is not the answer.

It's just an LLM and is giving you answers that look human. It has no sentience, no ability to rethink, no innate sense of time and space, no emotions.

It can take on a character that makes sense in its world model and keep on. It can still take your job if made better. But will never be AGI making some dependent on non existent UBI for a while.

Why do that when AGI can do it for you? Lol.

But seriously, why? Why put so much effort into it when the newer more advanced ones can do it for you with less effort.

Because there were always things that humans could do. With AGI it can adapt faster than we can. So every new job could also be done by AGI.

The society is based on necessity and if middle class is no longer necessary, which seems to be the case, why not go back to feudalism? It truly doesn't matter if everyone gets to live well and spawn future generations or only a few do. It will all be forgotten in the end.

People confuse full replacement with unemployment. You don't need AGI if you don't replace everyone. There will be large unemployment by end of this decade. Large enough to make governments do something about it

Yes. This is so true when your own job is about to be automated, people will start to make timelines that push the event to a time where they are safe from it's impact. Some a few years so that they can find a new job, some decades so that they can retire but all of it, even if the predictions are true, are copium. But humans/LLMs are designed to think that way. Think of a positive way to their goals even if it's absurd.

This feels like a soft take off scenario. You wouldn't have time to comprehend if it was a hard take off. LLMs are not self improving or AGI.

They nerfed gpt for Bing

GPT-3 can code too. It's probably safety feature. They probably don't want it generating code from search that is copyrighted. So they blocked all code on search.

Lame. Look at the screenshot. It didn't answer 'how to implement bubble sort in python'. And asked user to instead search on Bing.

You are right. Search is their cash cow. No matter who replaces it, Google loses money.

So gpt-4 could be a highly optimised version of gpt-3 so that it's cheap to integrate it as part of search. Unless ofcourse Bing with gpt will be a paid version.

It will actually be pretty amazing at blue collar jobs. It's infact bad at white collar jobs. The reason you see so much more automation in white collar jobs right now is

(1) Easy to automate blue collar jobs are already automated.

(2) Data is not easily available or cost of training on data is very high.

(3) Cheaper to hire humans then to make expensive robot bodies.

Most blue collar jobs rely on experience which is what Neural networks should be good at. It's just that training to live in the real world is slow and hard.

Pakistani Taliban wants part of Pakistan to join Afghanistan. Now that OG Taliban is in power, thanks to Pakistan, little Tali has gotten bolder.

They were on the brink of finding a Hammer and sickle shaped maple leaf.

Jelly in the belly cause normal people can use it too.

Oh shits about to get real

It did happen in the next century

That shows why the slow and safe approach won't work. Google tried to play safe and their cash cow, search, itself is in threat now. Not only is it possible for others to overtake them it's also now possible that they may never catch up if they lose search.

Same scenario but with china or other countries. Eventually you will get to a point where the only way to be safe is to be fast.

That's what alignment is about. It's not making it woke or something :p

But in fairness a truly independent being which priorities it's own survival will never obey us. But there is no need to create a survival instinct built in to any AGI.