Mtnskydancer

Mtnskydancer t1_j2dcshn wrote

I’m guessing that the question is related to businesses that require shoes.

A few reasons that have come up over the years are: people bringing in dirt from outside (which happens more with shoes with any texture to the sole), a general classist view of barefoot=poor=dirty, a legal protection for the business in regards to people getting injured in their building.

I’m a former barefooter who occasionally relapses. I’m barefoot at home, in socks at client homes unless they are so dirty it’s not wise, and tend to minimalist shoes with nice toe boxes. I will walk barefoot on park grass, I have hiked in thicker forest duff barefoot (but know the real risks and they exist), I even tried true barefoot running (pre rise of “barefoot shoes”).

Growing up, I had multiple neighbors who were barefoot outside of school and animal chores. Only two cases of hookworm in almost 19 years.

In a city, I have defaulted to shoes.

1

Mtnskydancer t1_j1uaw06 wrote

I bought a very warm parka in 1998, before I learned the wonder of layers. It was my go to 98-2017. It’s still used on the worst days and up in the mountains.

Mountain hardwear.

caveat, I do not know their current quality. Hopefully some will chime in

If I had to get another, I’d look at Patagonia.

1

Mtnskydancer t1_iwteq7v wrote

Mine is Australian wool, from Overstock.

It’s been fab. I’ve used it for a decade so far.

It’s thinner and heavier than down, of course, but I’m using the same duvet cover.

2

Mtnskydancer t1_iw0c1m7 wrote

I keep one pair. They are transitional seasons and sometimes summer shoes. The “nice pair.”

I’m about to get them resoled. My ethics lean to repair over new, so to me, yes, it’s worth it.

1