SamPost

SamPost t1_ixg617z wrote

Well, given that the local voters just voted in the same politicians allowing the ACHD to ignore these blatant federal clean air act violations, you should expect more of the same for years to come.

For 200 blue collar jobs we have degraded and disgraced our entire city.

17

SamPost t1_iujdfvh wrote

Reply to comment by timesuck in Book Cafe by life453

People have all kinds of ulterior motives, from unjustly disgruntled employees, to those fishing for a monetary settlements. And, the world is also full of sexual predators. So, I try to keep an open mind.

Myself, I was just hoping to see if anything under oath had emerged. WESA legal council is only concerned with slander liability, which is a meaningless bar for truth.

−9

SamPost t1_iuj4dej wrote

Reply to comment by timesuck in Book Cafe by life453

I wasn't being at all dismissive, and I really have no prejudice one way of the other as I haven't been a patron since before the FH bridge collapsed. But I wanted to get informed as I will be in the neighborhood more often once that link is reestablished.

I was simply pointing out that when the article was written the situation was still in the he-said-she-said stage, and it is unfair to draw firm convictions from that when more evidence should since have emerged in the ongoing case. Which we should all want to know.

−2

SamPost t1_iuitzz6 wrote

Reply to comment by timesuck in Book Cafe by life453

This look kinda old. Has there been any update? Especially on the civil suits? I couldn't find anything and while I don't want to support a scumbag, I also don't want to condemn someone based on lightweight allegations. Any info appreciated.

2