Stronkowski

Stronkowski t1_iu06y3i wrote

Godamn 86 pages. So I'm definitely not going to spend the time to read through that whole thing, but here's the policy goals from slide 6:

  • Ensure the continued vibrancy of office space downtown, working with both companies and building owners to maintain and grow building occupancy

  • Expand housing downtown

  • Expand the daily use of downtown beyond work by bolstering downtown's cultural, art, retail, services, and hospitality ecosystems

  • Support connectively and mobility downtown via multi-modal transportation infrastructure and protected infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists

  • Enhance economic opportunity downtown by supporting women, BIPOC, and other underserved populations, and by strengthening the small business and creative community

  • Grow Boston's footprint as a global tourism hub

Seems like a mixed bag to me, but mostly good. The housing and transportation goals seem like they'd do the heavy lifting if actually implemented.

33

Stronkowski t1_itx8xi2 wrote

There's tons of resistance to building offices or labs. It probably is somewhat less to housing because it avoids a few of the complaints NIMBYs will use, most frequently using up residential services/parking (and doesn't compete with their own housing, which often goes unsaid), plus often times these aren't in residential areas so they have fewer neighbors to be NIMBYs in the first place.

12

Stronkowski t1_itwwjfm wrote

You probably are, as I've done multiple hikes in the hundreds of miles distance (one of which was even out there in the Rockies). If you were a more experienced hiker than I am I doubt you'd have mentioned that possibility.

I've yet to do Rainier, but if it's actually got any grade or technicality it'll be the first for me out of hundreds of miles worth of trail out there. Being high elevation doesn't make a hike difficult, and switchbacks are boring AF. They're the treadmills of hiking.

Meanwhile, yes the Green and White Mountains have been tougher than anything I've found out west yet. Going straight up rocky terrain instead of winding around on a horse graded trail is a huge difference.

1

Stronkowski t1_itv5g6k wrote

No, the views are a small part of it. Otherwise you should just drive up a mountain road and take a photo instead of hiking it. A good hike is supposed to be tiring.

And not a single brewery I've been to in the area has had air conditioning. This doesn't matter for 99% of the year, but when you get a week like happened at the end of this past July every sucks because the city hvac is built assuming that's not going to happen since it's almost always 70 degrees instead.

1

Stronkowski t1_itqyzll wrote

I've had to spend a lot of travel time there for work, including multiple weeks at once.

I find it more boring and soulless. The food is very mediocre. Public transit is worse, and I feel much more forced to drive than I do around Boston. Lots of car parking is a bad thing. The weather is hardly ever "good", it just avoids most "bad".

I disagree that western hiking is better; the views during it certainly are, but the hikes themselves favor switchbacks far too much. They're just too easy.

Also nothing has AC. That's fine for the majority of the year, but it means when there is that one week heatwave you can't even comfortably sit in a brewery.

2