Surur
Surur t1_j3463cc wrote
Reply to comment by HippyWizard in Depressing subreddit by CatharticFarts
> So, everyone here is a climate change person?
Certainly if the hat fits, wear it.
> Publicly funded, safe, public transportation. I am sick of having to drive myself to slavery everyday shits getting real old.
It's never what you can do for others, its what they can give you for free.
Surur t1_j342zt1 wrote
Reply to comment by HippyWizard in Depressing subreddit by CatharticFarts
Given that this is not a politics sub, climate change is their pretext always. They will come with climate-change-related "efficiency improvements" e.g. all cars should be banned in cities because of CO2, but 5 comments later, their real nature would be revealed.
Surur t1_j33yfs1 wrote
Reply to comment by HippyWizard in Depressing subreddit by CatharticFarts
> why are you purposely mislabeling ACTUAL activism?
I have no idea what you are on about, but all you are doing is ruining a sub.
Surur t1_j33x6t6 wrote
Reply to comment by HippyWizard in Depressing subreddit by CatharticFarts
The 'climate change people' are not climate activists, or naturists.
The best label would be communists or the new fancy term, degrowth activists.
Surur t1_j33vdlo wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Depressing subreddit by CatharticFarts
I said there is already a sub you can commiserate with everyone else who shares your opinion.
Surur t1_j33rqdd wrote
Reply to comment by HippyWizard in Depressing subreddit by CatharticFarts
> Start opting into energy programs and ev's. Literally we support future tech. The Fuck!?
Posts about solving climate change with technology have always been futurology. That is not what the 'keyboard activists' are about.
Surur t1_j33re8t wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Depressing subreddit by CatharticFarts
You know, if that is your opinion, there is already a sub for you called r/collapse.
Surur t1_j33mk87 wrote
Reply to Depressing subreddit by CatharticFarts
It's the climate change people who want to squash any optimism about the future. They believe that progress is what is killing the world, and the right move is to go backwards (to the 1930's I think) so obviously they are anti futurology and they actively sabotage the content here.
Surur t1_j2m8t9o wrote
Reply to Why can artificial intelligences currently only learn one type of thing? by ItsTimeToFinishThis
I think that is the wrong take. It's like asking what would happen if we teach language to the cerebellum (the part of your brain that coordinates movement). Our brain has plenty of specialist structures to deal with specific functions e.g the visual cortex, the amygdala for memory etc.
What I think is significant is that the same technology (artificial neural networks) lets us do so much (in different implementations) suggesting we are on the right track towards AGI.
Surur t1_j2jvfjk wrote
Reply to PV Cells Still Generally Produce 80%+ of Initially-Rated Power Despite Expected Damage by Alias_The_J
Solar is like magic. What else can you buy that will deliver year after year for decades afterwards?
Surur t1_j2ew06z wrote
Reply to comment by TheTomatoBoy9 in Game Theory of UBI by shmoculus
With solar energy, prices often go negative and some companies get paid to use energy.
There is an idea that we would create 7x as much solar capacity as we need, for reliability reasons, and then have massive amounts of waste energy on many days.
Surur t1_j2dn16j wrote
Reply to comment by Economy_Variation365 in Game Theory of UBI by shmoculus
> advanced robotics will lower the costs of goods and services, making it feasible for everyone to enjoy a decent lifestyle.
It's what we hope for. But in terms of initial implementation, it would only be acceptable (to workers, as u/AndromedaAnimated notes here) if it's clearly inferior to working.
I guess we saw a bit of UBI during the pandemic when people were paid to stay at home, but unfortunately I worked in an essential service so I had to go to work every day. I guess the main benefit was that the roads were very clear lol.
Surur t1_j2dh6tz wrote
Reply to Game Theory of UBI by shmoculus
> Is the assumption that AI and production will be managed by the state instead?
This actually makes a lot more sense financially. Instead of money, the government can supply the basics of living (food, water, heat and homes, healthcare), a small stipend, and everyone who wants more will need to find some opportunity (if available).
I don't see how people could live in relative luxury on UBI, as the tax burden would be too high.
On the other hand automation and AI may allow even people on UBI to enjoy a great quality of life - imagine each person having a personal robot at their beck and call for example.
Surur t1_j2behid wrote
Reply to comment by GomerStuckInIowa in Can you spot the AI art? by gelimaurk
Nearly one-quarter of respondents (24%) confessed to a soup-related “white lie” – they admit to passing off canned soup to dinner party guests as homemade! Millennials led the pack with nearly half (48%) saying they’ve engaged in this shady behavior, while far fewer Gen-Xers (22%) and Baby Boomers (5%) admit to the same. Furthermore, more than twice as many men (36%) than women (14%) say they’ve passed off canned soup as homemade.
Surur t1_j2bb8pw wrote
Reply to comment by GomerStuckInIowa in Can you spot the AI art? by gelimaurk
I said many, not your mom.
Surur t1_j2b3moh wrote
Reply to comment by GomerStuckInIowa in Can you spot the AI art? by gelimaurk
Many mothers pass off canned soup as home made lol.
The story of an AI art is the story of the prompter - why did they want to make that particular image.
Sure, they do not have full control of the result, but if they did not approve they could always discard it and make another.
Surur t1_j2a4xfy wrote
Reply to Can you spot the AI art? by gelimaurk
Got 16/21. I was doing so well, but the last few tripped me up. Interesting test - once AI can do hands and faces properly, the detection rate will be a whole lot lower.
Surur t1_j255hqk wrote
Reply to comment by VinceSamios in SpaceX launches 54 upgraded Starlink internet satellites and nails rocket landing at sea in 60th flight of the year by ovirt001
Ah, you are right. They just turned them on 60 days ago.
https://wccftech.com/starlink-turns-on-laser-satellites-for-region-with-fourth-month-long-night/
Surur t1_j252j70 wrote
Reply to ChatGPT is cool, but for the next version I hope they make a ResearchAssistantGPT by CommunismDoesntWork
That is actually a pretty good doctor-level answer, though I understand you are looking for research scientist level .
I think you have a good idea.
Surur t1_j24vvyb wrote
Reply to comment by Sh36fjk374fjc in SpaceX launches 54 upgraded Starlink internet satellites and nails rocket landing at sea in 60th flight of the year by ovirt001
So there are 1.5 million cellphone towers in the world, and that is just on land.
An orbital shell 500km up has a surface area of 593 million km2.
So if SpaceX managed to get 40,000 satellites in orbit, that would be one satellite every 15,000 square km. That is one satellite for the same surface area as Connecticut or 10 for Illinois.
That is a lot of Space between each satellite.
Surur t1_j24ueck wrote
Reply to comment by r2k-in-the-vortex in Your wastewater can be used as renewable energy by EnergyTransitionNews
I think the macerator is key, though, else the system would get clogged very quickly.
Surur t1_j24sxnx wrote
Reply to comment by Sh36fjk374fjc in SpaceX launches 54 upgraded Starlink internet satellites and nails rocket landing at sea in 60th flight of the year by ovirt001
The thing about Space, it's big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mindbogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
Surur t1_j24sgfv wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in SpaceX launches 54 upgraded Starlink internet satellites and nails rocket landing at sea in 60th flight of the year by ovirt001
You people are both obsessed and deranged.
Surur t1_j24e25v wrote
Reply to comment by ovirt001 in SpaceX launches 54 upgraded Starlink internet satellites and nails rocket landing at sea in 60th flight of the year by ovirt001
I have heard them called Starlink 1.5 satellites because they are the same size as the version 1 satellites.
Surur t1_j34860y wrote
Reply to comment by BigRings1994 in Depressing subreddit by CatharticFarts
Ignorance used to be bliss but now the stupid people are very depressed it seems.