As many people have said...

Humans do this every accident... just less accurately.. People weigh things like there's a semi, and there's a car a family...

If the AI had no other options besides this trolley example, then it's logical deduction is the single person. We would consider this legally logical for anyone... but with human drivers, there's a chance they're not even going to see the large group by looking at their phone, or dash, or you name it..

These decisions already happen regularly, as long as the AI is choosing logically, and statistically accurate on those decisions... The number of lives saved will be astronomical compared to humans driving.

Car's AI: "WHY IS THERE PEOPLE on the ROAD?!, that's it, i'm removing them."

The headline though, if you only read that, it seems they built the current system with billions.

Wasn't saying elon's bot is the answer, was saying it wouldn't need as strong of an AI like that would..

Robots are getting rather light footed and getting better, I don't see this being a problem in 10-15 years, if not earlier.

Edit: Like this isn't smooth by performance standards, but programming a routine is all that happened here... You can program a better routine with a lighter robot.. One not built for military. https://www.webpronews.com/boston-dynamics-robots-dance-together/

Reminds me of this project https://www.mlcathome.org/mlcathome/

I would say, having the eye ball view perspective and the sounds you heard, could trigger some serious memory recall.. Black out everything else and you might have something akin to hallucinations.

idk, we have a robot that can do parkour so... /s

It'll only happen at scale once robots are cheaper than humans. but this is a hypothetical anyway...?

I feel like people forget companies run these, the end dollar is all that matters.. A robot copying a human with tracking on, isn't going to be difficult, they wont even need advanced AI for the robots like, say Elon's bot. (honestly forget it's name...whatever)

Why would anyone bother making an assembly line working robot arm when we have humans? Money.

I fully believe AI could build a routine like performers, or copy it/mimic. Your point is strong, these are the types of things people will still pay people to do.. However, brings me to my question: When are we going to mandate AI created things be, labeled as such.. I can see a human like robot doing these performances and no one knowing its a robot. We're going to need to tackle that issue sooner than later... As its already happening with AI generated art.

You see, I understand now. Your point makes sense! I still disagree, but i have no technical reason for it anymore. Only time will tell if we can share enough of our experiences with AI that it can fool us into it's own creations.

Depends on which 'heavier' elements you're referring to, like beyond the periodic table? or iron?

Well said. Because that's the point of art, and i hope people continue to create art even though it wont have a commercial value... But that's really how it is already.. You don't do art for money, you do it because you love it.. aaand you need rent money.

Okay, sure.. But i have yet to see a technical reason why AI cannot make books on the level of the average author... Outside of humans feeling things should be human.

I am all for your passion, I appreciate all unique art. I may not understand what all goes into it, but i understand AI.. So honestly I could be wrong, but why do you feel that way?

Is this the conclusion you have? "Art carries a message. AI cannot put messages into art that humans will understand/react to because AI is not human."

Seems like the GPT3.5 already can put messages in a story, it takes hand holding, but it can do it. The AI is trained on human material, saying it can't because its not human, doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Everything it knows, is human, that's why it can write in our languages.

Sorry if something doesn't make sense, can't even proof read this without a customer interrupting..

Then start making an AI that can create writings with passion and emotion, cause that's coming too.

"The Dutch capital spent $65 million to create a parking structure that
can store 7,000 bicycles in a submerged facility at the city’s central
train station. "

Why do they need to turn a profit? Where were they putting the bikes before then? Makes their mass transit more efficient, its worth a loss.

/r/futurology

Have at it.

Considering the investments the OpenAI has going now, they ARE the startup. And GPT4 is supposed to be early 2023.. I don't see another company except maybe google, beating them to this release.. GPT5?

Definitely when someone dumps on the whole thing and completely misses the concept, definitely escalates the elevation of that shotgun.

Just came from futurology from what that's become... I'm no doomer and already happier here!

Even the fact it can produce quality, discredits all the bad works it produces. Rejecting the bad ones is simple enough, even if humans have to do it...

I don't see how it has an error rate is a problem?

Yeah, i've seen a number of outputs from this guy and he's posted a few odd ones, bodies turned halfway through, sitting wrong way on a bench that also kinda disappears.. It has issues, but it can output quality more often than not..

Its just remarkable, I'm sure in a few months we'll see a whole lot more come out!

You've been pardoned.

BUT, have you seen this? https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/407355414229811200/1026593684441022594/AI1.png

I don't know much about where they came from, but the AI is still training

Yeah, that definitely makes sense at a closer look, immediately had to edit my response lol.

You could make a paper! edit: Wait, these are AI papers, not papers on AI

Let me just have my robot restock my store shelves... Oh wait. That's not automated yet.

https://www.thoughtco.com/thmb/eeLON8lcmgEdkEFpKzTsHLmFpf4=/793x800/filters:fill(auto,1)/R2D2_MCH-IA-324_R_8x10-56a839a65f9b58b7d0f1a855.jpg