I was talking about OpenAI's GPT AI (ChatGPT, GPT3.5 / GPT4)

If that's not what the response is about then i guess it doesn't apply to what I said.. But OpenAI's GPT isn't internet connected, it learned by being fed all the information in a huge training round. After that the model is solidified and open for queries.

Ha! That would certainly make life interesting! I'm not sure if I'm ready for that kind of future, but I'm sure it's coming sooner or later. I'm more interested in the potential of AI to help us solve some of the world's biggest problems. I think that's where the real potential lies.

I see, so was trying to wall you into a corner and then inform you that ChatGPT does not have internet access for information.. It was trained on information in 2021 and before. Everything it has now is from memory. As with all AI models.

I don't know exactly what they do prompt wise, but i know they fine tuned the settings to be more, social.

Their API backend is "playground", lets you choose a model (GPT3 / ChatGPT is their top right now), but also lets you set the "temperature", "Frequency", and "presence" settings that can make it more attune to building stories and the like..

What i meant by manipulate the whole prompt is that you get 4096 Tokens to play with and when you ask ChatGPT to rewrite a paragraph, it feeds the prior conversation through with it... So it can get weird, in the playground you can strip your extra prompts from the scope and it has a much easier time remembering places and people..

One story i wrote even brought back 2 characters from a minor interaction chapters before..

So if i type "Who won the 2022 midterm election in the USA" it would be able to tell me?

edit: OpenAI

Neat use, but to clarify, are you using chat.openai.com , the ChatGPT, or their API backend("Playground") that lets you manipulate the whole prompt?

They managed to get this thing to look up stuff on the internet?

I think they mean "It's knowledge is limited to things before 2021"

I honestly would rather UBI be universally equal.. I can only see that going south in the end... like classes, yet again.

I could see a system of application to fund something out of budget, like a house expansion or literally anything outside of the funds.. I'm thinking post scarcity though, but until then, UBI + Minimal wage+ would be my answer for until post scarcity

You make some good points, I agree with most..

However, I think most jobs will be obsolete by the time AGI actually gets created. That's the biggest hurdle i have with the points you made.

Sorry we couldn't have an actual conversation but seems you don't know how.

>Then your posts are total gibberish.

Is it that hard to understand?

The comment I first made, was only talking about ignition, you keep telling me i'm against hydrogen cars.. I keep going back to informing you hydrogen can ignite, and dangerously.

I see where you got confused.. You thought i was conflicting with your world image.

I missed this.. Would have saved me a day in conversation with him.

Not admitting anything is safer...(Last paragraph of latest comment, if you forgot already)

The point?

1. My own imagination here is that i can convince you my only point here was telling you hydrogen COULD ignite...

idek what to say anymore.. You literally aren't comprehending anything i type, even just conversational statements... This is so difficult to repeat myself and now I learn you still don't know my point...

I honestly wish, I wish so hard, my brain was like yours. Life would be easy.

I've said multiple times that's liquid hydrogen.

My own imagination here is that i can convince you my only point here was telling you hydrogen COULD ignite...

Not saying hydrogen cars are more dangerous or less.

Not saying gasoline is safer.

I've only given you facts about hydrogen and how it could possibly ignite in a crash, you keep denying time and time again. Because of those videos, which again, were liquid nitrogen, the only gaseous hydrogen they showed was in a ball tank that..exploded.

Listen, i don't care what is safer, i feel its too early to tell, and so far they're doing great. I'm waiting for when the rare event happens that levels peoples homes comes up. Until this conversation i was under the impression that no way would people park these in garages but that opinion has changed.

dude, really.. Stop for a second.. A proper fuel mix?

Detonability of hydrogen in air are 18.3% to 59% by volume. There's the fuel mix for an detonation. Explosion is 4% to 75% ...

You're ignoring my entire comment.

Did you not read my responses to those videos? about how they're all LIQUID hydrogen? Which is completely different...

We have 15k hydrogen vehicles on the road, yes. And their tanks can withstand the harshest impacts. I get this. I get their safer, but the catastrophic failures of gasoline vs hydrogen are completely different. And these will happen. Hydrogen is the leakiest material we have, and ever will have.

My only point through ALL of this, has been about how you keep talking about liquid nitrogen and don't understand the difference.

It doesn't explode?!

Hydrogen can explode.

Wanted to drop some stats before you stopped listening, but here they are anyway.

Gasoline flamability limits in sea level atmosphere: 1.4%-7.6% (cannot ignite outside that)

Hydrogen: 4%-75%

Detonability of hydrogen in air are 18.3% to 59% by volume.

I'm not fear mongering but you're ignoring the other side too... I'm ignoring the gasoline cars because we're all accustomed to it.

What do you mean most likely wont ignite?????? Hydrogen is the single most dangerous gaseous atom we have.

Ignition source? crashes are full of them, what about the gasoline fire from the car that hit you? Or the time you open kick your door open and it scrapes the pavement making a spark? roads, garages, and crashes are full of ignition sources..

I just see us having a car sitting in a garage overnight, and a switch turns on, or a natural gas furnace kicks on and the building is gone.

I'm all for the attempt at hydrogen vehicles, but i don't see it as a fix all. I wouldn't drive one, hell i dislike my gasoline powered car. But you gotta accept that hydrogen can ignite after mixing. That balloon video ignited after mixing, how do you think a ruptured tank is going to look?

Here's a balloon full of hydrogen in a cardboard box, gaseous.

https://youtu.be/drrK3ETymwc?t=117

Video 1: That's like one i commented earlier, where it burns straight up from under the driver seat, thanks for the laugh again.

Anyway, video 1: That's only if it's ignited as it vents, they didn't give the gas time to vent without a flame cause...explosion.

Video 2: Most of these are Liquid hydrogen which acts much more safe than gaseous hydrogen as countless people have pointed out.

If you can, point me to a segment that is gaseous hydrogen.

For clarity, yet again, liquid hydrogen stays liquid until i can get enough heat to vaporize. Also, because of that, it doesn't mix with air well.

We don't drive hydrogen cars with liquid hydrogen, its difficult to work with, being cryo.

Brings me to the part of Video 2 where they show what happens when hydrogen mixes with air: https://youtu.be/7bFJK5kU_UQ?t=443

Definitely, just found it comical how even that was 'safe'

Even with a vent, its a serious issue.. where will the hydrogen go. But yes, without a vent you're gonna get a large over pressure event

Sure, hydrogen can dissipate quickly..

It can also ignite faster. Fill the area around or in a car in under a second, it wont dissipate fast enough.. You could argue it would dissipate oxygen too, but it'll already get mixed with the air before that happens. All it takes is a ignition point before the gas can dissipate, and there would be no fire, because there would be no car left.

Years ago, and I thought this was hilarious. I watched a segment on hydrogen fuel for cars.. I'm talking 12 years + ago.

but they claimed it was 100% safe and unlike gasoline, a fire would just vent out of the hydrogen tank.. They demonstrated this on a open vehicle frame.. They talked about how it's safe since hydrogen fires burn straight up. So in their demonstration... the tank was UNDER THE DRIVER'S SEAT burning straight up.

Epic! o.o

Not sure if any of that was just a marketing claims, investment demo, etc but i found it funny.

Definitely, eventually things will all have weights, as far as i know (using tesla as an example since they've taken this the furthest) they do object detection to find pedestrians or cars for that matter. Taking it further and adding weights to the object and then further into damage prediction would be a great way to extend that.

However I'm not sure what advantage it would have if AI driven cars' accident rate falls so low that collisions are rare, outside of weighting human/human carrying things vs property.

Awesome, anyone have specific ideas what this can solve? I'm at a loss for specifics, I don't deal much with biology.