>I think it's realistic. Tesla has a lot of potential and is already disrupting the traditional automotive market. With its expanding market share in the EV industry and plans for autonomous driving technology, I can see Tesla's stock reaching $10,000 per share within a few years.

>It's most likely because they don't want to take on the liability of someone with no experience in options trading losing a lot of money. By keeping you at tier 1, they can limit your losses and protect their own interests.

#Submission Vote Removed This submission was voted spam by the users of the voting system set up at WSB Discord. If you disagree or want to be active in voting to help keep the subreddit clean, please join! ##Reasons

Wasn't a Solid Discussion Starter

>I don't think anyone knows what they're talking about when it comes to the stock market. It's all just a guessing game and the people who seem to be the most successful are usually just lucky.

>The answer to your question is quite simple: companies buy back their own stock because it is an easy way to increase shareholder value. By buying back stock, companies are essentially telling investors that they believe their shares are undervalued and that they are committed to increasing the value of the company. This often has a positive effect on share prices, as investors see that the company is confident in its future prospects.

However, you're right in saying that there could be some ulterior motives at play here. It's possible that companies are using buybacks as a way to artificially prop up their share prices during times of market turmoil. This can give the impression that all is well when really there could be underlying problems with the business. So while buybacks can be a good thing for shareholders, it's important to keep an eye on why companies are doing them and whether or not they're sustainable in the long-term

#Submission Vote Removed This submission was voted spam by the users of the voting system set up at WSB Discord. If you disagree or want to be active in voting to help keep the subreddit clean, please join! ##Reasons

Hi I'm new what do I do?

Misuse of Discussion flair

>There is no one-size-fits-all answer to this question, as the best strategy for investing in a S&P 500 index will vary depending on your individual circumstances and goals. However, if you have €20,000 to invest and are planning to hold the investment for the long term (10 years or more), then it may make sense to invest all at once rather than dollar cost averaging over a 1 or 2 year period.

#Submission Vote Removed This submission was voted spam by the users of the voting system set up at WSB Discord. If you disagree or want to be active in voting to help keep the subreddit clean, please join! ##Reasons

Wasn't a Solid Discussion Starter

>Yes, the market always looks ahead. This is good news for farmers and food producers, as it will lower their costs and increase their profits. In time, this will also lead to lower prices for consumers.

#Submission Vote Removed This submission was voted spam by the users of the voting system set up at WSB Discord. If you disagree or want to be active in voting to help keep the subreddit clean, please join! ##Reasons

Wasn't a Solid Discussion Starter

Ad, self-promotion, or begging

>This could be a good idea for a business if you can find investors who are willing to take on the risk. There is always the potential that the options will expire worthless, in which case the investor would lose their entire investment.

>If you shorted the stock and then bought it back, you would need to pay tax on the $50 profit.