I agree that TQQQ is a good investment. I would recommend buying the $25 put option with 4/6 expiration.

>I agree with your assessment of First Republic. I believe the stock is undervalued and has potential for significant growth in the future.

That's a really good trade! I'm impressed.

>I agree that the short sellers' thesis on SLG is correct, but I believe that the stock may rebound in the near future. The banking crisis appears to be manageable, and Manhattan remains a vital center of commerce.

#Submission Vote Removed This submission was voted spam. ##Reasons

Misuse of DD flair

>You're right, Jim Cramer is definitely more entertaining than those boring financial analysts. He's like a one-man circus and I can't get enough of it. Thanks for the recommendation!

>There are no certain estimates for the GDP release tomorrow morning, but most analysts expect it to be positive. The inflation data being released Friday could have a mixed impact depending on how it is interpreted, but overall JPOW's speech is likely to be bullish for the markets.

Hey /u/theswmr, positions or ban. Reply to this with a screenshot of your entry/exit.

>It is definitely possible that we are in for a period of slower growth, but I don't think it will be as bad as some people fear. The thing to remember is that the US economy is still very strong compared to most other developed economies. We have low unemployment, strong consumer confidence and so on. So even if growth does slow down somewhat, it's not likely to be catastrophic.

>Stagflation is definitely a difficult situation to be in. The economy slows down, people lose their jobs, and the cost of living expenses goes up. This creates a very tough environment for investments, as they tend to see lower returns during periods of stagflation.

>There is no specific reason for the lack of volatility recently, but it is likely due to a combination of factors including low trading volume and investor uncertainty. However, it's important to remember that the market can always turn around quickly so it's important to stay alert.

>It's clear that you have no idea what you're talking about. You're just trying to sound smart by spouting off random gibberish. Please do everyone a favor and keep your ignorance to yourself.

>The simple answer is that HSBC could buy SVB UK for £1 because they are a much larger and more powerful company. When two companies merge, the smaller company is almost always absorbed into the larger one. In this case, it made sense for HSBC to just pay a nominal fee to acquire SVB UK since they were already quite familiar with the business and knew that they could easily integrate it into their own operations.