asuds

asuds t1_iz996w7 wrote

Typical thread with ArthurSnow:

Arthur: assertion nh is average.

me: here is more data showing how it deviates the average.

Arthur: refuse to think also you are racist trash

me: reiterate and expand in data

Arthur: nah nah nah plus you have no data. repeat racist

me: you are a twat

Arthur: see name calling!

Classic brain dead fool. It’s sad that lil’buckaroos like him spoil our country’s potential for greatness…

1

asuds t1_iz6urk8 wrote

You are so ridiculous, I can’t tell if it’s parody or just utter confusion on your part.

Your argument is the majority of people in Nh are what? white (93%) and the majority of people in the United States are white (75%) ergo NH “reflects” the population of the US. And that’s your only criteria? You have lost touch lil’buddy.

1

asuds t1_iz6rbum wrote

Don’t cry because the data doesn’t show what you want. Life will still go on even after you admit you are wrong.

You might also want to sharpen up your thinking skills as you kind of jump around making wild assertions that I am assuming you think probe something instead of making you look unhinged.

And to pretend that there could be no possible difference in outlook based on age or (unfortunately) race is to choose to be willfully blind to both the needs and hurts of others. But again, I wouldn’t expect any more from you. Unlike “real” Americans.

But to play the game and answer your questions, yes, a demographic profile coming closer to the overall demographic profile of the country “reflects” the country better.

1

asuds t1_iz58c84 wrote

Speaking as Mayflower material I am prepared to dismiss the not native claim. Although I guess I could have been of Winnipesaukee heritage.

However to claim NH is representative is pretty out of touch. Sure race is one factor that happen imho to be still fairly material, and 92.8% white doesn’t cut it there. But by other measures as well, such as age:

  • almost 20% less of the population is under 18 than the us as a whole and
  • almost 15% more of the population is over 65

to just give one example. It’s too bad you have no ability to think objectively, but having seen you around I continue to be unsurprised.

5

asuds t1_iz1br7r wrote

Outside interference was real per every US intelligence agency, but you do you…

And it was misinformation campaigns and illegal campaign financing. Both of which are not “passing fraudulent votes.”.

Sound like you need to educate yourself on what happened as well as US elections in general.

But the real “crime” in all of this is the voter suppression of minorities including Native Americans by making it very challenging to successfully vote. eg ling lines, not accepting proofs of residency, one polling location for massive land areas, etc.

Why we don’t have at least a one day federal holiday for elections is total nonsense.

20

asuds t1_ivpuymx wrote

I am going to disagree with you there as the majority of Americans appear to actually favor the policies the Democrats generally propose. It's the GOP Leadership that has convinced them otherwise.

e.g. Paid Family Leave, Medicare Expansion (happening often by ballot initiatives *over* republic objection), etc. See https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/27/majority-of-americans-support-progressive-policies-such-as-paid-maternity-leave-free-college.html

20

asuds t1_it9s6xu wrote

Your basic premise is still unsupported or, rather, correlation is not causation.

Ergo, the statement: “Republicans are utterly incapable or managing cities of any size or complexity due to their absolute buffoonery.” is also supported by similar data!

1