barsoapguy

barsoapguy t1_j76rqnj wrote

I have to think it’s a failure of the education system, the 20 year old kids can’t qualify or afford a 300K mortgage (because 20’s) so are forced to rent and are upset with high rents thereby vilifying landlords . Pushing for more and more restrictive laws that only push more landlords out of the market raising prices even higher.

Such a vicious cycle of stupidity.

2

barsoapguy t1_j76qe6v wrote

What’s sad is a lot of these guy just do not get it at all. The fact that it’s so hard to remove someone NOT LISTED ON THE LEASE is why a lot of individuals who could rent out a room in their home or even a second home just look at things and go “nahhhh”

Which means the rents that ARE available are so much higher (less supply) and only well qualified applicants are accepted.

1

barsoapguy t1_j76ppqm wrote

Someone not listed on the lease and not paying rent ? Ok bro here wasn’t on the lease but maybe just maybe if he had made the rent payments her and her crew might not have been so eager to evict someone giving them money.

Maybe if he had sold some of his guns he could have made rent 🤷🏿‍♂️

But you know the story , it’s some POS holdover with poor credit and apparently a criminal history who’s probably just trying to work the eviction system for as long as possible .

2

barsoapguy t1_j76p2f2 wrote

“Lapatin said Watson has a criminal record. He is being held on $100,000 bail.”

Yeah it’s always that sort of POS that does something like this, he was NOT on the lease .

The courts are SO slow to react ,I can entirely understand why people might take things into their own hands .

This lady probably took a chance and rented to someone without the best credit and he repaid her by allowing his POS cousin who definitely wouldn’t have passed a background check to stay over.

It should NOT be a big deal to remove someone not even listed on the lease when the primary tenant is no longer around . But no, you have to go through the ENTIRE eviction process as if you signed a legally binding contract with said party.

The take away here has to be you simply cannot take a chance on poor people. If the cousin had been middle class all she would have needed to do is start the eviction process and then sue for lawyers fees and anything else needed to cover the entire ordeal . A middle class individual would have the resources to allow the landlord to be made whole . A poor person does not.

How absolutely tragic.

1

barsoapguy t1_j76nott wrote

The number one thing a landlord needs to do is properly screen their tenants. You just cannot rent to anyone and you most certainly must never rent to people with low credit scores and shoddy histories.

That’s how you end up with these types of situations. The cousin must have been poor or with little or no resources otherwise the thing to do would have been to simply go after him for all the fees involved in eviction/repair/the deposit ect.

1