blipsman

blipsman t1_j6o4lt2 wrote

Other investors (not the company, in general) are buying the shares you are selling. If there isn't an even match of those who want to sell and those who want to buy, the price declines until the buyers and sellers are in equilibrium. If there are more wanting to buy than wanting to sell, then price increases.

Only when companies do share buybacks might your shares go to the company itself vs. another investor.

0

blipsman t1_j6dvxx4 wrote

New rulers, new religions, new building styles. Why do we see ruins in even modern urban cities? Why are there abandoned train stations in Detroit or Catholic Churches in Gary? The building is no longer useful (what’s the need for a temple to Zeus after adoption of Christianity?), it’s easier to build on a new location than do demolition and removal before building.

1

blipsman t1_j2e8z5i wrote

Cons are that there is no incentive for some team owners to field competitive teams, especially when so much revenue is tied to league revenues or long term broadcast rights.

Pro is that the American sports with giant stadiums, conferences and division alignments and such would all make a relegation system hard to implement logistically.

Say the NFL were to relegate the Texans and Bears at the end of the season, there is no second tier to send them to / from which to promote new teams into NFL. Even in sports with minor leagues, those teams are owned by major league teams to develop talent.

1

blipsman t1_j2cp8mv wrote

There is no money that goes anywhere.

Imagine you have a rare comic book and I tell you I’d pay you $100 for it, you turn me down. A week later, you need money to buy your mom a birthday present and ask if I want to buy it. But now, I only offer you $80 and you begrudgingly take it. There is no $20 of yours that went anywhere — I was only willing to pay less for something you have.

8

blipsman t1_j2c84y6 wrote

Let’s say 4 competitors all have 25% of market, selling laptops for $500 that cost them $300 to make. Now one cuts price to $460 so they’re making $160 instead of $200 per unit. But if they can boost their share to 32% of sales instead of the 25% they had, they’ll make more money overall.

Or even better, they’ve developed some sort of manufacturing advantage (efficient custom made to order rather than prebuilt configs, for example) that allow them to build each computer for only $270 instead of $300 so they’re not even losing per-unit margins.

3

blipsman t1_j2apj2a wrote

Lenders get funds from various sources, such as bank deposits and investors. You put money into a savings account and earn 1% while the bank lends that money on mortgages at 5% or credit card lines of credit at 20%. Institutional investors also buy baskets of mortgages, which act like bonds, and that means the banks again have money to issue more mortgages instead of having to wait for those loans to be paid off.

2

blipsman t1_j24k9le wrote

Because there are domestic rights and privacy laws that have to be abided by that countries don't follow abroad. Also, foreign intelligence is very different tactics/skill-set from domestic. Tactics used abroad to get information wouldn't necessarily work, and they may prevent successful prosecution of crimes because they violated rights, didn't properly collect evidence, etc.

14

blipsman t1_j1zhf0m wrote

If countries don't have their own currencies, then they lose tools that help them out of recessions or slow inflation... ability to increase/decrease money supply, using weak currency to export way out of recession.

If you look at what happened to Europe after the 2008 great recession, you'll see how a strong Euro hurt weaker European countries' recovery (Greece, Spain).

1

blipsman t1_iyf5p8a wrote

Drop shipping is when good are shipped directly from the manufacturer or wholesaler to the end customer, bypassing physical possession by the selling retailer.

There's nothing bad about it per se, as it allows retailers to sell goods it isn't able to hold in its own inventory. But it does limit a retailer's ability to control the fulfillment part of the process, ie. branded packaging, quality control. And may complicate return process.

10

blipsman t1_iydclsr wrote

Most likely not, because it'd be incredibly rare (impossible?) to see somebody with 75% of shares, but less than 50% of voting shares. If all shares aren't equal then you almost always see the opposite where some shares held by largest shareholder are worth more votes than others, ie. how Mark Zuckerberg has over 50% of voting rights on Meta stock despite owning way less than 50% of the company. But never less.

1

blipsman t1_iydc3di wrote

Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers were giant investment banks back in the day, but they weren't commercial banks so they didn't advertise to attract customers like the banks who might look for customers to open checking or savings accounts, or small retail brokerage accounts. Their clients/customers were corporations, large institutional investors (insurance companies, mutual funds, university endowments), other investment banks and private equity firms, high net worth investors (those with many millions to invest)... these aren't clients you advertise to on a billboard or magazine ad. Maybe you'd see ads in the Wall St. Journal or Forbes magazine. Certainly you'd see many mentions of them in such publications.

I grew up in an upper middle class area in the '80's-'90's, lawyer dad, lots of lawyer, doctor, trader types among my friends' parents and my parents' friends... I knew of Bear Stearns and Lehman even as a kid because we knew people who worked for them, my dad did work with them (he was an in-house attorney, often doing corporate acquisitions with investment bank involvement). I had friends who had internships with them during college (I myself worked at a portfolio management firm who often managed 7-8 figure accounts held by those firms), or even got jobs with them after college (one of my best friends growing up was an associate at Lehman when it went bust).

6

blipsman t1_ixzw5pe wrote

Consultants help companies change or improve their business operations. But it’s a broad directive based on specific case. Often, it means helping companies improve their operations through technology and software, like helping set up and customize a business software platform or even build a custom platform to help the business operate more efficiently… say something like allowing a chain of stores to better order inventory from the central warehouse, or a logistics company to better assign/plan delivery routes; helping an eCommerce company build a better, more effective sales platform that can do things like show customers actual real-time availability and offer alternatives if our, or upsell when they do find what they want (make sure to get ink for that new printer; this belt goes well with those shoes).

It can even be pretty mundane stuff, that’s actually much more complex under the hood due to interconnections… like when my company shifted from gmail/Google calendar & MS Office to a full Microsoft 365 set up that tied network logins to all software, meant migrating literally decades of emails and calendars, etc. and training employees on the new programs.

2