Hmm, Ben said 5-30 years a while ago.

>The reality is that ALL artificial intelligence today is pattern matching and nothing more.

This sounds like a construction to make your point. Reasoners exist, you can write a program doing logic. It's just not where the progress happens. Something more human-like needs to be constructed out of different parts.

We don't live in the time age of solutions.

That was always the plan, and to use them to raise children.

In the manosphere this is a topic. These independent women are chasing just even more successful and better looking guys. I doubt that buying a robot would be a good alternative for them. They are also the ones projecting shame into men doing this. Well, we will see...

The article doesn't mention the idea of open source aka free hardware designs and software as the obvious solution. Also, women are probably not attracted to a robot guy without a job and they are already covered with tools. It's guys who want a humanoid animated doll. Some wrong conclusions there. Not really a good article.

Well, work on it yourself...

Free hardware and software designs?

I assume, you are just trying to push your politics down into everyone's throat. There are most likely going to be people having energy and other ressources. Also, technology isn't obligated to solve political problems. It might solve it, or maybe it doesn't. Maybe the coming crisis will solve the problems by removing some elites, and not necessarily "the billionaires". People might even not agree, that there is a political problem. Just because you claim there's something to solve, doesn't mean everyone has to agree, or agree with the way you want to solve it.

We have enough for everyone and poverty

• and we share
• or we don't

We don't have enough for everyone plus technology

• and we share
• or we don't

We have enough for everyone plus technology

• and we share
• or we don't

It's a political decision, and it's futile to discuss these theoretical scenarios with hostile actors.

No.

Overpopulation is coming from the growth in poor countries, especially in combination with increasing standards of living. We were first. I will not limit my life time in favor of other people.

r/longevity

I don't think there won't be one cure and then you're done, it's about complex treatments during your lifetime.

Someone maybe said that back then, without having any data backing that up. The current situation looks much different.

Many of the drugs and treatments they're looking into are already approved, but for other things. If it's not approved fast enough, people will go to other countries.

This isn't how such progress happens. In US aging has now been acknowledge as a medical condition for which drugs can be prescribed. Drugs are also more systematically tested. There are some very promising trends, not just hopes and snake oil.

Skynet is fiction and in that fiction it was made by the military to kill people and they gave it the power to do so. Fembots like Cameron (TSCC) where on their way fixing it.

Not trolling, I mean it. The future has to be more like the future.

Thanks, I plan to use similar motors for my gynoid at some point. She won't need to walk much, so it should be fine.

It's fun switching between reading here and r/collapse

And for those without Twitter: https://nitter.dark.fail/jackyliang42/status/1587798590386233344

I was referring to a scientific experiment, lol.

You forgot about the part where the AI is making stuff up.. Also, at least big apes watch porn when getting the opportunity.

You think every human gets depressed? That's a mental disorder not a normal state of mind. Also, every language model would come up with some good answer on that.

Ooof, I don't get it why there are pornstars. Not everyone cares about the person, but only about the genre or type of activity. That aside, language models could probably answer your questions. The real detection would be in the contradictions or changing stories after asking similar questions after a while.