ctindel

ctindel t1_j1i4t7x wrote

> Plus, ideally there shouldn’t be a need for advocates to drive people into doing their job. If that’s necessary, isn’t there something much more wrong?

Well that was my whole point, it’s all a symptom of a much larger problem because the whole system is broken. It doesn’t “exempt” them per se but it seems weird to selectively apply the rules and excoriate NYU for something that is true all across the country.

1

ctindel t1_j1fz496 wrote

It’s a very sad story and there’s no doubt in my mind that lots of people die from substandard care due to being poor or not having someone in the hospital to advocate for them and stay on top of the care plan. I have two nurses in my family and they always talk about how important it is to have an advocate in order to get proper care.

My only point was that this isn’t an NYU problem per se, the problem is systemic and only regulation can fix systemic issues.

1

ctindel t1_j1dts0y wrote

> Your socioeconomic class...including the type of insurance you have, determines the quality of health care you get in NYC and around the country.

This happens even in western europe, where everyone has coverage but people with more money can pay for upgraded service or to skip the queue. I don't know any country where a billionaire or whatever their equivalent of a senator is differently in the hospital.

0

ctindel t1_j1dstsg wrote

Every hospital in this city (and I'm guessing everywhere in this country) offers better service for VIPs and their families. None of this is limited to just NYU.

Money talks. If they want to end the ability for people to donate money to these institutions it might help but even then I doubt it would fully remedy the problem.

Rich people even pay a third party service staffed by doctors and NPs who will meet you at the hospital and be your advocate, talking with the medical staff, reviewing all the charts and orders and being on top of it to make sure your shit is taken care of. It's nice to be rich.

6

ctindel t1_j190854 wrote

Well I mean people Moscow Mitch was banned from restaurants. It was a new article but it’s not like there was tons of consternation and pearl clutching. Plus he’s famous and visible they weren’t using mass surveillance techniques and AI to block normal people from doing a girlscout troupe activity.

Why aren’t democrats up in arms about this shit? Where is Bernie and AOCs bill to prohibit companies from using facial recognition in personally discriminatory ways?

4

ctindel t1_j12sukn wrote

What's astounding is that they were hit by 2 more trains AFTER they were killed by the first one.

https://abc7ny.com/subway-person-struck-mta-train/12593529/

"Police say a 44-year-old man and a 63-year-old woman had been hit by a train shortly before 10:30 Tuesday morning.

After the first train hit the victims, a source close to the investigation confirms to Eyewitness News two subsequent trains ran over their bodies amid confusion from 911 callers about where the incident had occurred."

15