genericrich
genericrich t1_j8rif6p wrote
Could also be an early sign that we can't control these things. <Kermit sipping tea.gif>
genericrich t1_j8ocyez wrote
No privacy considerations there, lmao. "Just feed your entire personal life into this black box that may keep it forever!" What could possibly go wrong?
Just keep a diary, bro. Nobody is going to ask themselves your example questions, in real life.
When did I graduate? Pretty sure people know this answer. Did I like the experience? Do you have dementia? You know if you liked it.
Why did I break up with X? Pretty sure you remember why. Did I contact her again? Why do you want to know this?
What did I eat on some random date? Who cares? Is this really worth literally giving a machine outside of your direct control (or understanding) access to this data, forever into the future?
Seems silly and only borderline useful. Not worth the tradeoffs you would be making.
genericrich t1_j8edv7b wrote
Reply to comment by billtowson1982 in Would an arcology be conceivably possible? by peregrinkm
Sure. But the time to do it is now and the place to do it is on Earth, before we send some poor slobs on a one way trip to a Martian grave.
genericrich t1_j8edlrk wrote
Reply to comment by SoylentRox in Anthropic's Jack Clark on AI progress by Impressive-Injury-91
<eyeroll> Nobody is saying there haven't been major changes in AI in the last few years. I certainly am not saying that.
But many of the underlying algorithms were well understood in different disciplines and the industry knew they would have application for AI, but the data and infrastructure just weren't there in the 60s or 1980s.
genericrich t1_j8ebipv wrote
Reply to comment by SoylentRox in Anthropic's Jack Clark on AI progress by Impressive-Injury-91
Gradient Descent was well understood in the early 20th century for fluid dynamics I believe.
So, not false. :)
genericrich t1_j8dm43q wrote
Reply to comment by peregrinkm in Would an arcology be conceivably possible? by peregrinkm
Sure. But I suspect it is harder than it sounds and since nobody has succeeded in it yet, that's probably the place to start.
Won't do anybody any good to send folks to Mars so they can starve to death or otherwise die there when we could be spending time now to understand how to build a self-sufficient enclosed ecology.
(If going to Mars is even worth doing, that is. I favor space habitats myself, vs investing in expensive gravity wells.)
genericrich t1_j8dl72p wrote
Reply to comment by Scoobywagon in Would an arcology be conceivably possible? by peregrinkm
Biospheres were failures, though. Nobody has succeeded in this yet.
genericrich t1_j8dl3v2 wrote
Reply to Would an arcology be conceivably possible? by peregrinkm
Nobody has done it yet. Probably a good idea to learn to succeed at this before, say, going to Mars or something.
genericrich t1_j8dbwqt wrote
The main drivers for AI progress recently have been:
- Availability of massive amounts of structured data that is easily accessed via the Internet.
- Massive GPU farms in cloud infrastructure, used for the statistical math these AI systems need.
Most of the algorithms were written or understood back in the 60s, but everything was stored on paper back then, and there were no GPUs for fast matrix math.
genericrich t1_j865dcx wrote
Reply to comment by decomposition_ in US officials disclosed new details about the balloon's capabilities. Here's what we know | CNN Politics by taci7c0ff33
Oh, sorry, I wasn't aware Reddit was the place you had to cite your sources for speculation about how folks aren't seemingly aware of how useful a balloon is for surveillance, and under what scenarios they might be critical.
Will leave the basic googling to you. Look into how cheap and useful balloons are, and why you might want to use them to understand and prepare for a conflict your military has been tasked with getting ready for, regardless of whether or not you intend to really fight a war.
genericrich t1_j8649zy wrote
Reply to comment by WestSixtyFifth in US officials disclosed new details about the balloon's capabilities. Here's what we know | CNN Politics by taci7c0ff33
News Flash: Militaries whose governments may not want war nevertheless plan for war. We have plans for invading Belgium, updated annually, for example. Not because the USA wants to invade Belgium, but because we want to be ready to do so if we need to.
Making the US agitated serves very little purpose, other than escalate tensions. You don't build and fly sophisticated spy rigs hanging from balloons without a plan, and China is known for long-term planning. It's not ridiculous notion to suggest that an otherwise nonsensical surveillance platform might have a use in a post-war scenario with the USA.
genericrich t1_j84dfds wrote
Reply to comment by thefugue in US officials disclosed new details about the balloon's capabilities. Here's what we know | CNN Politics by taci7c0ff33
You do this before a war to get a baseline of what you can gather with a balloon.
In the war, the satellites will all get shot down. It will be hard if not impossible to put up new ones after that. Look up Kessler syndrome.
So now you can fly your cheapie spy balloons over the ravaged USA to see what the Americans are up to next, and compare it to what you learned before the war.
genericrich t1_j6j5iyv wrote
Reply to comment by dilligaf6304 in LPT Request: How can I actually grow taller? by korggyy
I am 6'4" and let me tell you, it ain't easy. Some highlights:
- "Do you play basketball? You should play basketball" - heard that for years and years.
- Finding clothes that fit sucks. It's hard.
- Air travel is a nightmare or very expensive.
Plus, tall men die earlier than short men. So, that sucks too!
genericrich t1_j63hrqe wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Asking here and not on an artist subreddit because you guys are non-artists who love AI and I don't want to get coddled. Genuinely, is there any point in continuing to make art when everything artists could ever do will be fundamentally replaceable in a few years? by [deleted]
AI art is a fad. It all looks the same and is already quite boring.
genericrich t1_j557x1r wrote
Reply to What a cheeky bastard… by MainBan4h8gNzis
That's a shitty poem.
genericrich t1_j4vbj4j wrote
Reply to Getty Images is suing the creators of AI art tool Stable Diffusion for scraping its content by nick7566
Good for them. About time someone stood up to these soulless VC-funded land grabs.
genericrich t1_j4sm4u1 wrote
Reply to comment by Donttrustallfarts in Stephen Colbert to Produce Series Adaptation Of Roger Zelanzny’s Sci-Fi Novels ‘The Chronicles Of Amber’ by Neo2199
Colbert is hilarious. Maybe you just have a shitty sense of humor.
genericrich t1_j4slvxy wrote
Reply to Stephen Colbert to Produce Series Adaptation Of Roger Zelanzny’s Sci-Fi Novels ‘The Chronicles Of Amber’ by Neo2199
Holy fuck that is awesome.
genericrich t1_j29chwy wrote
learn a bit about the cultural context of where his plays were written and performed. that will help ya.
genericrich t1_j26b1ng wrote
Reply to Digitism by ZoomedAndDoomed
Wankerism. Digitism sounds like you're worshiping fingers.
genericrich t1_j1zrg36 wrote
Didn't even know they had an office in Boston.
genericrich t1_j1uzvxo wrote
Earth based math.
genericrich t1_j1sh1to wrote
Reply to comment by mocha_sweetheart in Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
Oh he's a joke all right.
genericrich t1_j1sg3po wrote
Reply to Driverless cars and electric cars being displayed as the pinnacle of future transportation engineering is just… wrong. Car-based infrastructure is inefficient, bad for the environment and we already have better technologies in other fields that could help more. An in depth analysis by mocha_sweetheart
But, but, but...Elon makes cars!
genericrich t1_j8rii8v wrote
Reply to comment by tobi117 in Bingchat is a sign we are losing control early by Dawnof_thefaithful
oh i think you could be surprised