He should dress up as a monster and scare people like scooby doo

Also most insurance doesn’t have the network or amount of tow trucks and on the road assistance personnel as trip A. Also insurance general reimburses you after you pay for a tow where’s AAA gives x amount 100 mile towed a year.

Flat tire, dead battery, quick tow, locked keys in car, tire change, easy and faster passport and DL renewal or replacement…I think the annual membership fee is cheap as fuck,

Why wouldn’t you have a AAA membership?

There are barely any smart meetings. There are AA meetings everyday multiple times a day everywhere

Zoning

Baby girl, don’t you worry. Hunny 99 is here to stay. Baby girl you should apply

I gave up caffeine and alcohol. It’s much betrer

So I think we can agree like solar isn’t as good as coal for generated electricity. When coal powered our nation we didn’t have these issues.

Bro you know that’s not happening

What exactly is your issue with what I said? I already stated nuclear should get even more funding and is the future and better long term then the other renewables. But nuclear is expensive, takes a long time to go live, political redtape, not in my backyardism make it costly, slow and sometimes impossible to get up and running.

Right now with the limited amount of money, the political climate, the current state of the energy industry, the window of time in which we need to decrease emissions, it makes more sense to invest more in solar and wind. We can more quickly reduce emissions which increases the window of time before the earth gets to hot, which gives nuclear more time to improve and become cheaper and more politically favorable.

I did not say that nuclear is bad and that wind and solar are carbon negative or that they produce enough energy to meet all our demands.

Based on the current science, political climate, money and time available, a long with the fact utilities/manufacturers/sellers/technicians/funding/governments have been pushing and have create an environment in which solar and wind are viable to be wildly adopted and installed. Regardless of we should do, that is going to happen.

I’m saying that should happen sooner. In the mean time nuclear gets billions of dollars from the government. It should. The funding, planning and promotion and researching and developing and the building of many more nuclear power plants should happen.

Because nuclear power plants take so long to get up and running usually longer than planned and go over budget

Along with solar and wind being more easily implemented

Push those more now, get emissions downs, which gives us more time, fossil fuels costs and renewable maintenance costs go up, now we can free up and justify more capital and labor to build more nuclear power plants.

It’s a joke. Jim Jones. The cult in South America that committed mass suicide by drinking kool aid laced with poison in Jonestown.

I’m saying if we get passed the point of the in which we can’t stop the positive feed back loop of Earth increasingly getting hotter and hotter. We party for ten years or forever how long. Live life to the fullest. No wars. Just fun. When the planet gets so bad, that people will start to have painful deaths full of suffering. Instead of suffering,slowly dying, fighting over the remaining resources until we go extinct. The species commits suicide. It’s not a realistic or a serious suggestion. It was a dark joke.

I’m not against nuclear, we just need to use other renewables now to slow warming down, while doing that we develop and advance and build nuclear power plant’s more.

You are right reforestation, Algea, energy efficiency, energy use reduce are the fastest ways to drop it. We certainly won’t be fine nor will most of life.

It’s not too late yet. We just need to deploy it like crazy in the next ten years. Then nuclear. If we miss the deadline, everyone parties and does every vice for ten years then we Jim jones the human species together.

We need more. But you are right it’s expensive and takes too long to go live. Solar and wind funding needs to increase

But if we drop emissions now with wind and solar we’ll have more time to advance and get more nuclear live. 30 years is not a long time. Right now I don’t see the money or time or political climate for use to reduce our emissions quickly with nuclear. Go solar wind heavy for ten years, not stopping nuclear development in the mean time. Reduced emissions can extend that window to sixty years and the need for nuclear to fill the void of fossil fuels will be more clear and politically favorable.

We don’t have enough time. We have to use solar and wind to drastically reduce emissions. Then we can be sustainable with nuclear. Nuclear takes to much money and time to go live. If we get nuclear going sooner but didn’t decrease emissions enough to stop temps from rising before hand we are fucked. the permafrost thaw and ocean will be releasing methane and greenhouse gasses at an amount and rate at which humans emissions makes zero difference. The planet will continue to warm and warm and we can’t stop that. We won’t survive that. Solar and wind etc are the quickest ways for us to drop emissions to drastically slow that down so that we can then have the time to go nuclear. So nuclear is the future but we need to do other renewables right now so we have the time to go nuclear. Nuclear is hella expensive and takes time to go live. We don’t have the time and money currently

I get your point. My point is our only option is to greatly and rapidly expand solar, wind, hydro in like ten to twenty years. Because that’s the quickest way to lower emissions to the point we don’t cause the unstoppable feed back cycle. Obviously nuclear is greener and more sustainable and the to long term solution. Ideally 50-60 years ago, we would have invested way way way way more into nuclear and energy efficiency along with renewables. We don’t have enough time currently to invest into nuclear more or reallocate funds from renewables to nuclear. Nuclear takes too long to go live without red tape. We need to get emissions down now. Then go more to nuclear. If we go nuclear now at the expense of other renewables, we won’t get emissions down fast enough. Yeah we’ll have sustainable energy with nuclear sooner but it would be too late. Us reducing emissions then won’t stop the feed back cycle, we are toast. We would have been better off just living it up emitting more emissions and all agreeing at a certain date fir ever country launching their nuclear weapons so we die quicker. Humans won’t survive but life might. Maybe the nuclear winner and removal of man will allow for the planet to heal.

Yeah issue is the there isn’t enough time. We need to go solar and wind rapidly first. People forget about the green house effect. At a certain point, a near point in the future, the positive feed back loop of earth warming and getting continuously hotter becomes unstoppable. Then live in our known universe is gone forever.

The federal government should heavily fund the nuclear energy and the creation of many micro reactors. It’s the most environmentally friendly thing to do.

The one of the reasons the gov favors the fossil fuel industry is for the military. Fed gov needs to keep it profitable so that we have fuel and fuel production, refinement ability for war.

You can request them. They’re supposed to at the table you pick up the ballot. They’re optional

Thought it was a ct post lol

Mack it basket wtf? I never heard that before. Nvm thought this was the ct subreddit.

What?

Should be 50 cents

We need more horses and donkeys in this state