kmkmrod

kmkmrod t1_j08e36a wrote

He’s going to lose his license.

There’s a minuscule chance he won’t if he gets a lawyer, but if he goes in without a lawyer there’s 100% chance he will.

21

kmkmrod t1_iycxo7p wrote

This might be the most ignorant post in r/Maine.

They have to go 53 miles to get to an existing power line they can follow. If they deviate from that plan there are a dozen groups (I already listed them for you) who will happily file another injunction to stop them. You believing they can ignore the approved plan and just turn south to clear cut western Maine is comical.

1

kmkmrod t1_iycugkq wrote

You didn’t understand the court ruling, you didn’t know what the plan was, you dumbly think “nObOdY iZ dOiNg aNyThInG!”, you have every point of the discussion wrong and you think we’re dumb?

🤦🏻‍♂️

1

kmkmrod t1_iycty0g wrote

Reply to comment by Laeek in Oh no. This is not good. by [deleted]

Post deleted.

I guess u/TheElevatedHero is off creating an organization 🤣

Because the Appalachian Trail Club, Sierra Club, Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine, Maine Audubon Society, Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, Natural Resources Council of Maine, North American Whitewater, Restore, Say No to NECEC and Trout Unlimited are just sitting on their thumbs I guess

1

kmkmrod t1_iyct69r wrote

> Natural features and it'll be the first step towards tearing down massive chunks of the western Forrested area.

53 miles is “massive chunks”?

> Much of the controversy over the project focuses on a 53-mile stretch of the corridor that would be built on working forest land between the Quebec border and the Forks in Maine. The remaining two-thirds of the project follows existing power lines created for the state’s hydroelectric industry almost a century ago.

And aside from that, you asked “can someone do anything…?” and my answer stands. Only the court can stop it.

1

kmkmrod t1_iycrolg wrote

Only the court can do something to stop it.

And it won’t “destroy our way of wildlife” even if it does get built. Extremist hyperbole doesn’t help your argument.

4