man2010

man2010 t1_iujp1uj wrote

Unfortunately I don't think the USPTO accepts osmosis as the basis for a science background, but if your wife wants an equally grueling but higher paying job than a medical residency she could always look into it. Of course the pay tips back to favor doctors after residency, and she has probably spent close to a decade working towards just her residency, but I guess it's an option nonetheless

2

man2010 t1_iujjpf5 wrote

FYI, without a science background you won't be able to get into patent law. I'm not an attorney but I'm familiar with the field and you're right that there is a separate licensing exam through the USPTO, in addition to needing a science/engineering degree. There are other areas of IP law where you don't necessarily need that science/engineering background, but you might struggle to break into them in Boston. The common path for patent attorneys is science/engineering first, and then using that knowledge to practice law rather than the other way around. Trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, and transactions would be your avenues into IP.

And if you have a bachelor's or higher in a science or engineering field then you can ignore this entire comment and look into patents

7

man2010 t1_iu2fzuf wrote

This is dependent on your other expenses and financial goals, but in general yes you can live comfortably on your own at that income

1

man2010 t1_iu17ixb wrote

Regarding number 2, that development includes over 700 new housing units of which more than half have already been built at The Sudbury, and the entire project will include retail/restaurant space. Writing the entire project off as a hideous lab building is laughably off base.

4

man2010 t1_iu0otoj wrote

Franklin St isn't Newbury St which the previous commenter specifically mentioned, and I'm not sure why you're bringing it up. The city has had 39 bank closures since the pandemic started, and nationally the trend for over a decade has been more branch closures, especially in metropolitan areas and among larger banks. One street isn't representative of the larger trends.

10

man2010 t1_itgqfcc wrote

A lot of these aren't really comparable to implementing single payer healthcare at the state level since they're either one time costs that make sense to use our one time record surplus on or aren't at all comparable in terms of cost to single payer healthcare. Our one year surplus isn't useful when talking about a new, massive public health program that would need to be funded in perpetuity.

2

man2010 t1_itdu1a4 wrote

5 is highly dependent on how it would be funded, and a more realistic state level improvement would be to build on our existing healthcare policies and maybe to expand MassHealth as a public option.

6 is a no brainer, but our legislature won't actually make it happen. I'd be interested to see their reaction if this ever made it as a statewide ballot initiative.

12