pan567
pan567 t1_j1grih4 wrote
Reply to Recommendation for BIFL chef's knife? by notproudortired
For gifts, I agree that Western is the way to go. I would recommend considering the Wusthof Classic, Mercer's forged lines, and Victorinox, depending on what you wanted to spend.
Mercer is quite a lot of knife for the money. The Genesis is good for bigger hands.
If you are looking to add a utility knife or two, the Spyderco Utility models with FRN handles are also great.
pan567 t1_j1gp4d9 wrote
Reply to Can anyone suggest a durable non stick cook set? Preferably one which doesn't break the bank by revnhoj
I am yet to come across any non-stick that lasts very long. I went to stainless about two and a half decades ago, but my parents have continued to buy non-stick and, after a few years, even the nice ones lose their effectiveness and go belly up.
My All-Clad stainless set is about 25 years old. It looks and functions the same as when it was new. It took a little while to learn slightly refined methods to avoid sticking, but definitely doable.
Well-seasoned cast iron is also always a solid choice, IMHO.
pan567 t1_j0v8p5d wrote
Reply to My father has developed asthma in his mid 50’s and I think an air purifier in his bedroom would be really good for him. Do you have any recommendations? by C_A_N_G
Do you want a BIFL model?
Most units are not built with a housing or motor or even a cord that will last a lifetime. A few exist that are built in the US and Canada, but these units are generally at the upper pricing spectrum. Most of these units, unlike the imported models, are also designed to impact volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and they have higher operational costs as a consequence of this.
If you are looking for a good purifier for a smaller bedroom, the Winix 5500-2 and Coway 1512 are both hard to beat, as they are around $150 on sale, have a decent amount of airflow, have reasonable filter replacement costs, and are reasonable with respect to energy usage and noise. If the room is over 400 square feet, you would want either a larger unit than the 5500-2 or 1512 or to consider two units if the bedroom is exceptionally large (or a much larger single unit). These are not BIFL products, however, even though they are reasonably well made. They will work against particulate matter (PM) - they will not have much impact on VOCs.
pan567 t1_iwo4b7m wrote
Reply to Could someone recommend an air purifier that doesn't need the filters thrown out and changed? I am willing to clean them of course! I have BAD allergies and 3 cats so it needs to work well in medium size areas. by Relaxandbreath
Unfortunately, for bad allergies, I would highly recommend consideration of a HEPA filter, and these are not typically reusable with how they work and how ultrafine particles behave. (There are a few washable filter units available, but the ability of these filters to effectively reduce particulate matter over the course of time, especially following multiple washings, is not really well established and efficiency can decrease. If you did want to go this route, Honeywell offers a few products to consider.)
For really bad allergies and cat dander for a medium room, I would highly recommend consideration of a unit with a very high level of airflow that uses a HEPA filter and has a reusable prefilter, as a prefilter that can catch larger particles and be cleaned will prolong the life of the HEPA filter. The Coway AirMega 400s (or smaller 300s) is a fan favorite, because it uses H13 HEPA filters, has reusable prefilters, draws air from more than one side, moves a tremendous amount of air, is quiet, and is energy efficient. Filter costs are not terrible, and you can get about ~15 months from them, especially if you are vigilant with frequently cleaning the prefilter. Medify, Levoit, Rabbit Air, Winix, and Alen also make some sound offerings, and the Alen BreatheSmart, Levoit 600s, and Medify MA-50 and MA-112 are other stars with high levels of airflow, although I would consider the AirMega to have the most favorable balanced attributes in most cases.
If the price of the AirMega is not favorable, the Winix 5500-2, Coway Mighty 1512, and Levoit 400s are ones to possibly consider. They are not as energy efficient and do not have as much airflow as the AirMega, but are still great choices for medium rooms.
Finally, one budget option to mention is the Corsi-Rosenthal Box. This is a DIY filter made from furnace filters of MERV-13 or higher and a box fan. It will reduce particulate matter, although not as well as a true HEPA unit will, and for your case I would definitely recommend a HEPA unit. That said, it's inexpensive, easy, and would likely still help, so it is worth noting.
pan567 t1_itf5qdm wrote
Reply to comment by ListofReddit in BIFL recommendations for an air purifier/filter and oscillating room fan? by contradictoryhuman
I can't speak to the 5300-2 and 535, but Winix does make good products, so those are probably good units. With respect to both the Mighty and 5500-2, both have pretty reasonable running costs. Each does a bit better than the other in different areas.
The 5500-2 and Coway Mighty separate the carbon filter from the HEPA filter, which, to me, is an advantage. The 5500-2 has two different carbon filter options-one that is a carbon mesh, and the other which has actual carbon pellets (the latter being better), whereas the Coway is only the former. The Coway brand filter should be a bit cheaper than the Winix brand. Filter Monster, and other respectable third party makers, should make third party replacements for both (I've tested a Filter Monster product for a Whirlpool and found it to perform equally as good as OEM against PM2.5). Both are rated at 12 months and, if on a budget, IMHO, stretching it to ~15 should be just fine provided you are frequently cleaning the prefilter.
Probably the biggest difference between the two comes down to energy usage. To my understanding, the Coway is more energy efficient on lower fan speeds, and the Winix more efficient on higher. I feel running on higher is always a good thing (if the noise is tolerable), so if you are going to run it on a higher speed, this favors the Winix 5500-2.
One other option to mention, if on an extreme budget, is the Corsi-Rosenthal box. This is effectively a box fan taped to MERV-13 filter(s). It is not very pretty to look at, but it is very effective with respect to filtering particulate matter. That said, while its up-front cost is much lower, energy consumption is higher.
pan567 t1_itc9xqo wrote
Reply to comment by ListofReddit in BIFL recommendations for an air purifier/filter and oscillating room fan? by contradictoryhuman
tldr; Levoit makes good products at a reasonable price, and their filters are good quality--which model are you considering? Levoit recommends 6-8 months on most of their products, I believe. I would also recommend considering the Coway 1512 Mighty and Winix 5500-2, both of which I believe are 12 month intervals and, if filter costs are a problem, have some good third parties that also offer filters for them (not certain about Levoit in this regard). The Coway filters, even the factory ones, are very inexpensive.
​
in detail; Getting into the nitty gritty, it's hard to say exactly when a HEPA filter needs to be changed without a standalone air quality meter (and, to some extent, the ability to measure airflow through the unit itself). HEPA filters actually get more effective at capturing particulate matter the longer they are used. Then, after a point, their filtration efficiency falls because it gets clogged to a point where airflow through the filter becomes more difficult and decreases. This process gets expedited if extremely large particles cover the outside of the HEPA filter, so a lot of makers add reusable prefilters that capture hair, fur, and dust--clean these often and this can prolong the life of the HEPA filter (to a limited degree) and also the life of the unit (as the fan motor isn't working as hard).
The speed in which the above happens is highly dependent on the environment in which it is used and frequency/speed the unit is ran (Side note - I recommend running these units around the clock at the highest tolerable speed.) So, generally, they provide a rough filter interval estimate to try to account for average conditions. In a highly polluted environment, you may need to change it more often. In one with less pollution where you are constantly cleaning the prefilter, you could probably get away with longer change intervals (although some makers do require you to change the filter on their interval to maintain the factory warranty.)
Now, another thing to think about is carbon. Many filters today have carbon pellets impregnated into the HEPA filter, where a single filter contains both the HEPA + carbon components. The amount of carbon in most consumer units is very, very small, and its ability to impact VOCs for any prolonged period is extremely limited. This carbon will generally exhaust long before the HEPA portion of the filter, and some makers do appear to base their filter change intervals on this. With Levoit and most of the major manufacturers, I do think it is important to note how they are very much oriented towards the filtration of particulate matter. Their ability to reduce unwanted scents, and especially harmful VOCs (e.g., benzene, formaldehyde, etc.), is very, very limited. Arguably, particulate matter is going to be a bigger concern for most buyers, but if something is needed specifically for VOCs, a different kind of filter should be considered.
pan567 t1_is872x4 wrote
Reply to comment by RWBreddit in BIFL recommendations for an air purifier/filter and oscillating room fan? by contradictoryhuman
Bear with me, as I am about to geek out a bit.
I have/have had more than a few air purifiers in my day, but the only one I consider BIFL quality is my AllerAir Pro 6, as it has a stainless steel body, uses a commercial fan, and is built in the USA. It is appropriate for extremely polluted air, has enough airflow for the largest of rooms, and is very appropriate for use against VOCs. (However, it has some notable downsides, ranging from purchase/operational costs to its terrible 1990s-era aesthetics to the absolute lack of basic features. Mine also weighs ~60 pounds, and you need to turn it upside down to change the prefilter. That said, its performance and its holistic coverage of the various types of air pollution is just stellar.) AirPura is another name that produces a purifier with the same design philosophy (and it has most of the same downsides). Austin Air is also often considered to be very good. Alen is another that builds an excellent product (BreatheSmart line) and, despite having way more electronic components and advanced features than the others mentioned, they have a very solid reputation. They also deserve credit for producing a unit that moves a ton of air through a very restrictive medical grade HEPA filter, yet still manages to be quiet, and with great efficiency. Their form factor is also great. Oransi also made a domestic product (EJ-120) that had a good rep, but they recently continued it---the company said they are going to release a replacement in the near future.
​
I own or have previously owned products from Medify, Levoit, Whirlpool, Honeywell, Coway, and BlueAir, which are some of the common makers often mentioned in reviews. All of these brands offer some pretty good product lines, some of which utilize excellent quality HEPA filters, have a lot of airflow, and do a good job at reducing PM1/2.5/10 levels (but note that they are not very effective with VOCs). However, these products are generally imported, the fans are not the most robust, the cords are not always durable, the construction is generally plastic (with some exceptions), and they often have a ton of electronics built into the unit, which can and sometimes do break. (I do have a very basic Whirlpool purifier that is about 15 years old and running strong, which deserves mentioning.)
That's not to say these products are bad, but it is to say that many of the air purifiers presently on the market often seem to prioritize other areas above longevity. Right now, the hot thing is putting PM sensors on purifiers that are then used to control fan speed, which is (functionally speaking) a terrible idea. Smart capability is also huge, as is more emphasis on less ugly designs (see my note above) that blend in better with the surroundings. Further, the price of many of those products is stellar, and their ability to filter particulate matter from the air is pretty solid. Medify, Levoit, and Coway all deserve special mention here because they offer H13 (and, in some cases, H14) medical grade HEPA filters on affordably-priced units.
I probably went a bit overboard here, but I hope this is of help.
pan567 t1_is3t1xs wrote
Reply to comment by RWBreddit in BIFL recommendations for an air purifier/filter and oscillating room fan? by contradictoryhuman
They perform well in independent PM tests; however, they do use ionization, and their filtration efficiency depends on this ionization as they do not use HEPA filters. Some buyers may not want the ionization (which you cannot disable on their models).
Like most purifiers, their ability to reduce VOCs is somewhat limited.
pan567 t1_j4m5iw1 wrote
Reply to Recommend a vacuum for small studio? by Wolf-Strong
Have you looked at the Oreck commercial line? The XL is a very simple design that has a very good reputation of reliability. For someone not worried about bagged vs. bagless and simply looking for a good vacuum that is designed to vacuum carpets and doesn't add on a lot of mumbo jumbo that can break, these might be ones to consider. My friend's mother has had her Oreck for at least several decades.