potus1001

potus1001 t1_j1gcfir wrote

Well I guess that’s going to be the first priority of Maura Healy’s new MBTA GM.

On the plus side for those of us who live in Boston, at least we don’t need to make plans to be out of town during that period.

26

potus1001 t1_j1auphr wrote

The issue isn’t on the expense side. There’s a lot of important priorities we should invest in. The issue is that MA is still running on Prop 2 1/2, which was a mid-80’s ballot question, which limits property tax growth to 2.5%. Maybe that was sufficient in the 80’s and 90’s. However, with general expenses increasing by 10+% YOY, we are able to do less and less each year.

−3

potus1001 t1_iuvk7ed wrote

There was no attempt to “dunk” here.

But do you have a source that says different than what this source mentioned? Because every article I’ve read on this situation mentions that the officers were allegedly allergic to bees, not that she knew they were allergic.

Any additional information you could provide to help me learn about this situation would be very much appreciated! Thank you!

1

potus1001 t1_iuru5c4 wrote

Completely disagree with you there! Regardless of what you think of the law, these officers were doing their jobs, in a non-violent manner, and didn’t deserve a potential death sentence.

If you don’t like the way the law is written, then either run for office yourself, or vote people into office who match your views. But to wish death on people simply for following the laws in a non-violent manner, is a stark overreaction.

People need to cool down the violent rhetoric!

1

potus1001 t1_iurpzua wrote

In all fairness, from what I read in the article, three officers are allegedly allergic, but it didn’t say she confirmed they were allergic, prior to using the bees.

Most likely, she used the bees without considering whether they were allergic or not.

Nonetheless I agree with you that it isn’t cool. It could even rise to the level of assault and battery with a deadly weapon.

0