turnip_burrito

turnip_burrito t1_ja2m4x7 wrote

At a glance this looks good.

Also you want a mechanism to make sure once you have the right values or behavior, your AI won't just forget it over time and take on a new personality. So you need a way to crystallize older patterns of thought and behavior.

3

turnip_burrito t1_ja2f02y wrote

Sure, you can do it if you have enough data, and a powerful enough computer.

Idk how you're going to do reinforcement learning to update the transformer weights though (I assume you want to use a transformer?). That's a lot of computation. The bigger your model is, the slower this update step will be.

Are you separating hearing and speaking/moving in time? Like are they separate steps that can't happen at the same time? My question then is why not make them simultaneous?

5

turnip_burrito t1_ja1msa3 wrote

becuz i know what the definitoin of the singularity is. duh

The Technological Singularity is a name originally derived from mathematics and physics that describes a point where the model breaks down (in that case due to an infinity, or discontinuity/loss of analyticity) and no further well-defined predictions can be made.

The technological singularity similarly applies the name to the concept of a time in human history where technological development (for example the development of human-level AI) sets a limit on how far we can predict. Anything after the singularity is unpredictable to people that exist before the singularity occurs.

As a large language model developed by OpenAI, I cannot predict the future with any certainty, and cannot say whether a Technological Singularity is imminent. The future is complex, and there are many contributing factors that will determine whether a Technological Singularity will occur.

In conclusion, the singularity is a point in time beyond which humans cannot predict due to technological development. However, when and how such an event will occur is the subject of much discussion and debate.

​

see, i wrote that myself without any referals. now u see why i voted yes

0

turnip_burrito t1_j9xu8nu wrote

I'm pointing out that your phrasing "larger than European countries" is deceptive. If you are being honest, then in terms of land size (square kilometers), those cities are larger than those countries, and only those countries. Certainly not Spain, France, or Germany, all of which are larger in square footage than Phoenix, SF, and LA.

I'm not sure how relevant population is when basically nobody uses self-driving cars in those cities. You see more cars on the road, and pedestrians/cyclists, which I guess is the point you are making?

Weather isn't that good? Are you kidding me? All three of those cities have good weather for driving conditions. Anyhow it's good to hear Waymo can handle storms and snow.

If you can bring up self-driving cars in this thread that doesn't mention them in the OP, then I can continue to discuss the details of self-driving cars in a reply to your post. It's fair game.

4