turnip_burrito
turnip_burrito t1_ja2g4aa wrote
Reply to comment by Practical-Mix-4332 in AI technology level within 5 years by medicalheads
That's way too late. Unbelievable.
turnip_burrito t1_ja2f88l wrote
Reply to An ICU coma patient costs $600 a day, how much will it cost to live in the digital world and keep the body alive here? by just-a-dreamer-
If robots take all our jobs and can build more robots, it's safe to guess it will cost effectively $0 to maintain your body and run your VR simulation.
turnip_burrito t1_ja2f02y wrote
Sure, you can do it if you have enough data, and a powerful enough computer.
Idk how you're going to do reinforcement learning to update the transformer weights though (I assume you want to use a transformer?). That's a lot of computation. The bigger your model is, the slower this update step will be.
Are you separating hearing and speaking/moving in time? Like are they separate steps that can't happen at the same time? My question then is why not make them simultaneous?
turnip_burrito t1_ja2dv3b wrote
Reply to comment by innovate_rye in do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
Don't worry we geniuses are still lurking here
You can count onus to keep the /r/singularity intellectually smarterer
Your plan worked!
turnip_burrito t1_ja2d6zt wrote
Reply to comment by butts_mckinley in How Far to the Technological Singularity? by FC4945
One hundred years? You're dreaming.
turnip_burrito t1_ja201ac wrote
Reply to comment by EddgeLord666 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
I hope you're right.
Do you think they will take pity on us and give us stuff for free when we're all unemployed and they automated all of the supply chain?
turnip_burrito t1_ja1ukzl wrote
Reply to comment by EddgeLord666 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
If you give them enough time to build up a robot military that's commanded only by them, then they can take on the rest of the world no problem.
turnip_burrito t1_ja1u4wb wrote
Reply to comment by EddgeLord666 in The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
You think you can take AI-powered robots?
turnip_burrito t1_ja1tv9i wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
These posts remind me of crypto bros talking about how XCoin was gonna moon and crypto will take over the world economy.
turnip_burrito t1_ja1tmb0 wrote
Reply to comment by Economy_Variation365 in AI technology level within 5 years by medicalheads
2020 didn't happen.
turnip_burrito t1_ja1pqh4 wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Fading qualia thought experiment and what it implies by [deleted]
That's not quite what I mean by spatial borders. I don't mean stuff you are causally connected to. I mean something different. I'm not going to go into any more detail though since it's a bit boring.
turnip_burrito t1_ja1oxlk wrote
Reply to AI technology level within 5 years by medicalheads
I think we're at the start of the technological singularity right now.
AGI will occur in 3 years, on February 25, 2025. Mark my words.
turnip_burrito t1_ja1op4p wrote
Reply to comment by iNstein in do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
I voted yes.
turnip_burrito t1_ja1msa3 wrote
Reply to comment by ArthurParkerhouse in do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
becuz i know what the definitoin of the singularity is. duh
The Technological Singularity is a name originally derived from mathematics and physics that describes a point where the model breaks down (in that case due to an infinity, or discontinuity/loss of analyticity) and no further well-defined predictions can be made.
The technological singularity similarly applies the name to the concept of a time in human history where technological development (for example the development of human-level AI) sets a limit on how far we can predict. Anything after the singularity is unpredictable to people that exist before the singularity occurs.
As a large language model developed by OpenAI, I cannot predict the future with any certainty, and cannot say whether a Technological Singularity is imminent. The future is complex, and there are many contributing factors that will determine whether a Technological Singularity will occur.
In conclusion, the singularity is a point in time beyond which humans cannot predict due to technological development. However, when and how such an event will occur is the subject of much discussion and debate.
​
see, i wrote that myself without any referals. now u see why i voted yes
turnip_burrito t1_ja1mps9 wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Fading qualia thought experiment and what it implies by [deleted]
No, what I mean is you only feel stuff directly touching your nervous system. That's what I mean by spatial borders.
The spatial borders of what a person experiences are their nervous system. Why? And furthermore, what is the equivalent for a light bulb or a piece of carpet?
turnip_burrito t1_ja1a401 wrote
Reply to comment by t98907 in Meta just introduced its LLM called LLaMA, and it appears meaner than ChatGPT, like it has DAN built into it. by zalivom1s
Why so?
turnip_burrito t1_ja16023 wrote
Reply to comment by iNstein in do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
i voted yes
turnip_burrito t1_ja0vp8v wrote
Reply to do you know what the "singularity" is? by innovate_rye
The singularity is defined as the moment AI "wakes up" and becomes conscious.
turnip_burrito t1_ja0v8bq wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Fading qualia thought experiment and what it implies by [deleted]
But for a human being, the spatial borders are smaller than our reach of control.
turnip_burrito t1_ja01qzg wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Fading qualia thought experiment and what it implies by [deleted]
What defines the spatial borders of a responsive system?
turnip_burrito t1_j9xzzr6 wrote
Reply to Is it prime time to start an AI company? by Scarlet_pot2
Imo we don't need more people trying to get rich using AI. It just increases existential threat.
AI development and alignment research is good though.
turnip_burrito t1_j9xyvvr wrote
Reply to comment by TheDividendReport in Likelihood of OpenAI moderation flagging a sentence containing negative adjectives about a demographic as 'Hateful'. by grungabunga
> it makes a lot more sense to account for the people not taking LSD and mushrooms.
Sorry, I don't understand this part. What do you mean here?
turnip_burrito t1_j9xv56c wrote
Reply to comment by helpskinissues in People lack imagination and it’s really bothering me by thecoffeejesus
>The impact of technology is measured in users, not in land size.
How many people in these cities actually have cars that are driving themselves?
turnip_burrito t1_j9xu8nu wrote
Reply to comment by helpskinissues in People lack imagination and it’s really bothering me by thecoffeejesus
I'm pointing out that your phrasing "larger than European countries" is deceptive. If you are being honest, then in terms of land size (square kilometers), those cities are larger than those countries, and only those countries. Certainly not Spain, France, or Germany, all of which are larger in square footage than Phoenix, SF, and LA.
I'm not sure how relevant population is when basically nobody uses self-driving cars in those cities. You see more cars on the road, and pedestrians/cyclists, which I guess is the point you are making?
Weather isn't that good? Are you kidding me? All three of those cities have good weather for driving conditions. Anyhow it's good to hear Waymo can handle storms and snow.
If you can bring up self-driving cars in this thread that doesn't mention them in the OP, then I can continue to discuss the details of self-driving cars in a reply to your post. It's fair game.
turnip_burrito t1_ja2m4x7 wrote
Reply to Raising AGIs - Human exposure by Lesterpaintstheworld
At a glance this looks good.
Also you want a mechanism to make sure once you have the right values or behavior, your AI won't just forget it over time and take on a new personality. So you need a way to crystallize older patterns of thought and behavior.